>>What a muck you can be. Yes, I did read it. I guess it comes down to what you think is safe/unsafe.
>
>I have no idea what a "muck" is.
>
>I agree that we seem to differ in our perception of safety, and of course, the data doesn't provide enough information to really measure that. I suspect that looking at the details of the listed assaults, we'd find that the vast majority occurred between people who knew each other, so that the risk of random assault is actually even lower. (I suspect that because whenever I've looked at data like this, that was the case.)

So, having your child where the violence is is safe as long as it is not caused by someone they know. OK, I think I got it now.