>>When anyone points out the fact that your "would be" king is butt naked, I think you think it's all rhetoric. You are standing in the Obama soup line, and if he gets elected, we'll probably meet in the real soup lines.....
>
>I'm voting for Obama, but I'm not drinking the Kool Aid. I tend to be more of a Libertarian, and definitely don't like the ideas he's floating regarding economic "fairness". I don't think he's going to get a lot of his ideas, if indeed they are truly what he wants to get accomplished, through Congress.
>
>I'm voting for Obama because Republicans have to pay for Iraq and their fiscal policies. You can claim to be the party of fiscal responsibility, but if you don't walk the walk, then don't talk the talk.

Now I'm confused. I just don't understand your logic. In the first paragraph, you are suggesting that voting for Obama is closer to your libertarian views? I don't think you really understand libertarian then. He (as in his party and his party's policies) is so far removed from libertarian that he's off the scale.

In the 2nd paragraph, if I understood you correctly, you are suggesting that not allowing the Republicans into the white house is the means to punish them for the debt incurred during the last two terms...