Level Extreme platform
Subscription
Corporate profile
Products & Services
Support
Legal
Français
C# discussion: Redundant class names?
Message
From
29/07/2008 14:47:57
John Baird
Coatesville, Pennsylvania, United States
 
 
To
29/07/2008 14:11:49
Timothy Bryan
Sharpline Consultants
Conroe, Texas, United States
General information
Forum:
ASP.NET
Category:
Coding, syntax and commands
Miscellaneous
Thread ID:
01334856
Message ID:
01335040
Views:
22
>>>
>>>Do you have a suggestion for the next thread in my little C# series? How about generics?
>>
>>I'm not sure how far along you are, but I think understanding delegates is really important.
>
>I would second that and while you are at it, naming of delegates, handlers, events as there is so much confusion amongst writers that it was the hardest part for me in learning this topic. Some called the delegates ConnectionStateChangedDelegate and others called it ConnectionStateChangedHandler and others OnConnectionStateChanged. I have decided what is right for me.
>
>Tim


With the new generic EventHandler class, you don't have to worry about delegates any more. The plumbing is done behind the scenes.
Previous
Reply
Map
View

Click here to load this message in the networking platform