I dunno. I'd have to look at the timeline. Haven't paid much attention to it but when someone gets seriously ill I take them off my sarcasm and humor list. To repeat, a personal preference of mine.

>I agree with that as far as it goes. Maybe his story stinking to high heaven has something to do with it. He was OK to drive a car, he just couldn't tell he had struck a pedestrian. That was the tumor's fault, interfering with his senses at that exact moment. Then his mind was clear and he was on his way again. Cool.
>
>Right or left. If it had been Keith Olberman I would be equally skeptical.
>
>>I suppose you're right. I just get edgy when someone who's serious ill is treated lightly. Right or left wing. I guess it's my personality.
>>
>>>Lighten up, Francis. It's not like he made a joke about the tumor. He was making a joke about a guy and his car who happens to also have a tumor. Not the same thing.
>>>
>>>>I don't consider this funny in the slightest. Novak needs treatment.
>>>>
>>>>>>Did the tumor cause the accident or did the accident cause the tumor?
>>>>>>
>>>>>>http://www.wral.com/news/national_world/national/story/3290779/
>>>>>>
>>>>>>Pretty convenient either way.
>>>>>
>>>>>To me the funniest thing about the story, if you want to call it funny, was that Novak -- age 77 -- was driving a black Corvette convertible.