>>I don't pretend to understand the complexities of the Balkans in the 90's. But you're right - Serbia was the "bad guy". The root problem, IMHO, was that Yugoslavia was always an artificial country and when it began to fall apart it did not do so peacefully.
>
>Or perceived/coined as bad guy, where it was more like tripartite 'axis of evil' (Milosevic/Tudjman/Izetbegovic leaderships)
>However perception in this case amounted to conviction of mostly one side. This is exacty what I have problem with.
>Other then that, I admit that there is price to pay for people folowing bad leadership.

Bad leadership is a punishment in itself. Following it is another.