>>>Define 'baby'.
>>
>>Well, here's one example- a baby that has been delivered, even though the doctor was trying to kill it. It has survived the assault. Now the doctor wants to kill it. This is the circumstance where Obama voted to allow the murder.
>
>How can you argue with someone who can't define "baby" much less "human"?

This is exactly the kind of redirection I had in mind. The whole dispute of women's liberties is now gone into a few more years of heated debate, rechecking definitions, throwing in oddball borderline cases just to make (or score) a point, while the magician's other hand is revoking other liberties and doing one big absolute nothing to improve the lot of the majority of people.

So go on, heat up the debate even further, to the point where you'll fight for the right of fetuses to carry concealed weapons. By that time you won't be able to make any important decision in your life, but to choose between bad or worse master to serve.