>>>>>I agree. I would like to see the military court investigating and prosecuting statute of limitations to be similar to those in the civilian courts or even better, unlimited. There should be no statute of limitations on crimes.
>>>>
>>>>On war crimes there never was.
>>>>
>>>>Oh, sorry, I forgot. This is US operating on foreign soil. The international law may or may not apply.
>>>
>>>That is the problem with civilian courts here in the U.S. handling these trials. In our judicial system, there is a statute of limitations on many crimes. There is also a limitation on when a military court can try for actions while on active duty. That is the one that needs to be changed to unlimited and then the trial can go through the military court as it should.
>>
>>For war crimes, an international court.
>>
>>At least that's what the West warmly recommended to Serbia et al. I assume we aren't getting into any double standards, are we? What's good for the goose...
>
>
>I agree, but not all military crimes are 'war crimes.' I think they should go through the military court martial process and if it is deemed to be a war crime, be moved to the international court.

And court martial is organized by which unbiased entity?