>>In message #1321284 that Naomi mentions, you suggest 2 workarounds to someone
>>with a similar problem . Running the report twice (once to file) isn't a great option: this
>>process is already slow because of complicated data manipulation. But I'm not running
>>SP2 either. I've been thinking about it but.... This application is scheduled to deploy
>>any day. Adding SP2 would mean having to retest everything AND having to reinstall
>>on every workstation. I guess I just have to decide which evil is worse. Are there are
>>there enough benefits to SP2 to justify the pain?
>
>Lynda, is it possible for you to do the complicated data manipulation outside of the report so that running it twice isn't as painful?

If we need to determine number of pages per group and Cathy's solution didn't work, then I would assume the only solution would be to run the actual report twice.