>>>I think he needs three more messages until he fulfills his quota of distractions from the actual issue at stake, which is not any right to life at all, but revocation of any liberties or social network which aren't condoned by the bible belt. Rollback everything that is contrary to "homo homini lupus" - unless it's "I'll get all the money first, then be the master of it and decide to, or not to, give some as charity... but they'll have to depend on me, no guarantees, everyone for themselves".
>>
>>It just shows that liberties are numerous and every person has own priorities. For some people freedom means right to keep own property untouchable; for others, it is an opportunity to go outdoors without pants.
>
>Neither of these liberties should be mutually exclusive with the women's right to decide when to have offspring and with whom. I don't see any conflict with either property rights nor dress code, so... is this yet another attempt to change the subject?
>
>Sorry that I put the destruction of social safety nets into this one where we discuss McCain's decision to join the choiceless campus. I did that only because to me both the reversal of Roe vs Wade, assault on Social Security and many other issues are a part of the general attempt to revoke many of the liberties and pretty much return the country into the XIX century, socially. And spread that all over the world, as much as possible.

On the other hand, the ideas to destroy private property and market institutions is a clear call to move the country closer to your socialist roots.