>>just another little proof VFP is considered a real
>>programming tool (s)
>
>
>Who ever doubted about _that_ (uh uh)?
>
>BTW, and I do not want to take you optimism away, but this Goley fellow has a track record of defending FP. Again believe it when you'll see adds! I think the UT is more instrumental in keeping the Fox alive than M$. But then, I am a Dino.

Marc, you're missing the point -
the point is not that Goley has written (yet another) fox pro article
and not that fopro is a serious programming tool (which is what I think anyway)
but that a magazine like Dr. Dobbs thinks so as well..

>Talking of which. We somehow should put our experience together and formulate a kind of a road map on how to convert from FP to VFP, both from a technical point of view and from a management point of view. Just a suggestion.

Marc,
I truelly believe that the best way to move for FP to VFP is to re-write or not to move at all

Arnon