>>>>Hi Mike.
>>>>
>>>>>When I see a kid wearing a helmet, what I actually see is an overprotective parent.
>>>>
>>>>When I see a kid NOT wearing a helmet, what I actually see is a negligant parent.
>>>>
>>>>I've been wearing a helmet for more than 20 years (yes, as an adult) and I've had three crashes in my life -- two this year :( -- that involved hitting my head on the ground hard. My son knows that bike helmets are like seat belts: you don't go without one. It's just one of those common-sense things. Why risk a brain injury that'll screw up the rest of your life when it's preventable?
>>>>
>>>
>>>OK, reasonable people can disagree. When you put it that way, sure, no one wants their kid to get screwed up with a brain injury. But there are risks in everything. The question is how far we want to go in an attempt to head them off. Are we going to send them to school in hazmat suits in case there is a biological attack that day? Better yet, keep them home? They should be very safe there. OK, that's being a little silly. I guess I just don't think the chances of a kid getting a serious head injury on a bicycle, that a helmet would have been prevented, are great enough to warrant sending them out in armor.
>>
>>Do you wear seatbelts?
>>
>>You might this interesting:
>>
>>http://www.smf.org/articles/report.html
>
>http://www.whycycle.co.uk/safety_and_security/cycling_helmets/
>http://www.cyclehelmets.org/
>http://www.bath.ac.uk/news/articles/archive/overtaking110906.html
>
>and lets wear them while doing dangerous stuff like walking
>
>http://www.magma.ca/~ocbc/jpeds.html

How about in the states, we start by building sidewalks first? Most schools in North Carolina do not even have sidewalks between them and the local neighborhoods and children that live withing a 2.5 mile radius have to walk. It has always bothered me and letters to the editors of newspapers and local congressman have been of no use.