>>>
>>>I wonder if Michel hit some walls when porting to ASP.NET from VFP. This would not be a good thing. Or he is just over his head with all the features of the VFP to be converted to .NET and it is just a matter of time when UT will have all the original features.
>>
>>Probably both. Time will most likely resolve both.
>
>Hopefully. I can only imagine that if I ever converted my app to .NET, it would be a very steep climb for me to make all features to work in .NET. Is this a good reason for me never to go there? <g>
At the risk of starting a war (I really hope not), we are doing that now and there is no steep climb at all. Just being real...
.·*´¨)
.·`TCH
(..·*
010000110101001101101000011000010111001001110000010011110111001001000010011101010111001101110100
"When the debate is lost, slander becomes the tool of the loser." - Socrates
Vita contingit, Vive cum eo. (Life Happens, Live With it.)
"Life is not measured by the number of breaths we take, but by the moments that take our breath away." -- author unknown
"De omnibus dubitandum"