>>>>>Still doesn't explain why don't they boycott the Canadian and EU markets, where the conditions are so unfair and they lose so much profit. Why are they doing that? Playing loss leader with one or two products is one thing, playing that across the board is suicidal, and their stockholders should be told.
>>>>
>>>>Again you show some misses in general business terminology. Loss is something when total cost is higher than revenue, i.e. negative profit. On the contrary, losing part of profit is not a calamity as long as a company can keep some profits. You likely understand the advantages of mass production: additional cases can be produced at less cost than first ones.
>>>>Please, be advised that your inability to figure out basic business settings does not necessarily mean that business is in fault. It might happen that you could learn certain things before accusing businesses in all kinds of crime.
>>>
>>>Are you saying that the pharmaceutical companies are making profit in the Canadian and European markets?
>>>
>>>By the decibels I got the impression they're losing their pants there.
>>
>>It is your own decibels, so I leave pants issue to your discretion.
>
>Nice cop out. One last question: if they are making a nice profit on these markets, explain why are the same drugs, by the same American manufacturers, so much more expensive on the US market? Or is there never enough greed?
>
>And mind you, they are in the business of saving lives. This is not cosmetics or fashion or alcohol or cigarettes.

Due to government interference they are losing their shirts in Canada, they continue selling here out of pure altruism.