>Hello Everyone,
>
>We've recently moved our code base to use VFP 9.0. We've a piece of code that opens a table, processes certain records and creates a text file.
>
>In VFP 8.0, that process took around 3 minutes. With VFP 9.0, that same process with the same code base and database takes over 9 minutes. These local tables are opened as shared, but I changed that to exclusive and the time in VFP 9.0 dropped to 4 minutes.
>
>Has anyone else found performance issues when running their code in VFP 9.0? Does anyone have any idea why opening the table as shared in VFP 9.0 would cause the performance to drop?
>

One thing that changed in VFP 9 is that when CPDBF() <> CPCURRENT(), queries can't be optimized.

Tamar