Thank you Naomi and Hilmar.

You are both correct, your code is much better, but in any case rlock() is where the user get stuck.


>>Why you're not using SCAN here? FOR is a bit strange loop through the table.
>
>It can be done even simpler:
>
>

>locate for rlock()
>if eof()
>  append blank
>  ...
>endif
>