Well, I don't spend much time with right wing sources, and even I've been aware of this stuff, so I must have gotten it somewhere - and I don't mean just here on the UT. On the other hand, I can't honestly say that the papers here are the same as the papers there.

>There are some media sources who do the homework and raise red flags on Obama and others. But it doesn't make it to the morning papers which your average American draws his knowledge from. Let's be real here - if a Republican had the kind of associations Obama has had with Wright, Ayers, and the perpetually corrupt Chicago political machine it would be front page news, histrionically so, until he or she was hounded out of the race.
>
>>I may not agree with everything you say, but this is the only point I would jump on. If this is true, then how is that that you all know so much about his voting record, who he played with in college, who his religious friends supposedly are, and all the rest of the dirt. All from personal interviews?
>>
>>Ah. Ok, you said 'some' media. So I take it then that there is also 'some' media that does exactly the opposite? In which case, what's your point?