Clinton is right. I think the gradual democratization of the world over the past two centuries points up to that. OTOH, geopolitics is not a beauty pageant and I frankly don't think we should give too much weight to how the rest of the world "thinks" about us as long as we stick to our principles. As long as we're the first there in time of trouble, offering help, feeding vast populations, leading the fight against world disease and hunger I'd rather be unpopular and effective than otherwise.


>Did you see Clinton's sound bite where he said that the world had always been more impressed by American force of example rather than example of force? ;-)
>
>In terms of geopolitics we'll lead, they can follow, or they can STFU and mind their own business.
>
>That's pretty much what happened with the Iraq invasion. How did that work out for you? ;-)
>
>If you believe, as I do, that we're a major force for good in this world then you have to look the other way when we're being criticized and not take it too seriously.
>
>Yes, but you need to make sure that you're advocating "turning the other cheek" rather than "pride cometh before a fall."
>
>You'd be surprised at the number of people who like America as a leader. But there are many styles of leadership. Some leaders rule with an iron fist, through fear. Some rule because they can motivate their population. Sheesh, you know the story. I guess you guys need to decide what sort of leader you want to be. Personally I think Clinton's sound bite carries a lot of truth. ;-)