>>>>>But they did. Just stepping bravely through two births that would just make anyone else shake their heads in disbelief. Knowingly, or determinedly unknowingly (to the same effect) give birth to a child with Down syndrome, just to be in line with the party line, that's so... and now of course her daughter had a choice to carry the pregnancy to the end... because that's what happens to the girls who don't practice abstinence, as everyone can see now. And the father had the choice to get married.
>>>>
>>>>I am giving Gov. Palin the benefit of the doubt about the baby born with Down Syndrome. Some people do choose to have a baby even if they know it will not be healthy. I would not assume the decision was made for political reasons.
>>>
>>>Also the other one, "I don't really need to take care of the baby next four years while I'm the VP, it will be taken care of" is also a part of the same decision process, which also has nothing to do with politics.
>>>
>>>p.s. me mentioning the baby as "it" is only gender neutral - it will be years before his/her gender should matter at all.
>>
>>When did she make that statement?
>
>Never, it was my description of what I imagined as a probable attitude which could explain... some of it. Even if she did, we'd never hear it. Until, maybe, after the game, when all the insiders start writing books.


There is not doubt everything you mention is a possibility, but that is all it is. Supposition...