>>Did you see Clinton's sound bite where he said that the world had always been more impressed by American force of example rather than example of force? ;-)
>
>I liked that one ;)

That sort of reversal was very fashionable back home in the forties. Ðilas's article was "Anatomy of a moral", and the Party HQ rebuttal was "Moral of an anatomy", which went straight into history books. Also, the "force of arguments, not argument of force" was often mentioned, but sounds lousy in English translation, because the word "argument" has taken a completely wrong turn somewhere around Albuquerque/Lajkovac.