>>>>>I agree it's nasty and viscious, but where exactly is the connection you found between the media junk about her daughter and the Obama camp?
>>>>
>>>>Oh, I am sure Obama's supporters have had absolutely nothing to do with fueling the vitriol and are appalled that the candidacy of the New Man who is Above Politics has been marred by such unseemliness. A good example was Howard Wolfson (admittedly a Hillariarian) who said this "should not be about how many children Sarah Palin has."
>>>>
>>>>Kum-by-yah
>>>>
>>>>But I am not certain Karl Rove, Dick Cheney and the Bavarian Illuminatti are behind *all* of the the bile spewed in Palin's direction.
>>>
>>>See, now I don't understand this at all. If there crap in the media tilted against the McCain camp, then it is coming from the Obama camp, but any bile spewed the other way is the work of detached bloggers and viral emails that have no connection whatever with the McCain camp.
>>
>>
>>It's not that the Obama camp is behind it. But the main stream media does seem to favor Obama, and liberals in general. Obama doesn't have to play too dirty because the news media and the far left bloggers do that for him... in the name of journalism of course.
>
>It seems to me that from messages I've gotten from John, Charles, and Ed, that any mud thrown at McCain or Palin originates in the Obama 'camp' (which seems to include the media that is rooting for Obama). However, any mud thrown at either of the Obamas, is completely unconnected to the McCain 'camp' (which apparently does not include any media).
>
As far as I remember, just yesterday I told you my opinion about any mud, and if I remember correctly you agreed with me on that topic. However, today you partisanship caused you to say certain things that I already had chance to characterize.
I am sorry that I have to reply to you now. I do it exclusively, because you mentioned me in the message.