>>>>I should also mention that I thought Anita Hill was far more believable than Thomas.
>>>
>>>Me too.
>>>
>>>There is a strange thing with women in the U.S. though. Most often, a woman's greatest critics are
other women.
>>
>>Such is the world. We expect women to bring change, to bring a different way of thinking and doing things in politics (and elsewhere). But for a woman to climb up the ladder, she first has to master the masculine art of climbing... and lose much of her feminine mind along the way, replacing it with climber's skills. Women in the audience are the first to notice what's wrong.
>>
>>Eventually they may build sufficient critical mass to change the rules of the game so even normal people can be in politics. I do hope so, or else entropy.
>
>Women movement is no different when it comes to being with their own kind. Women's movement is for liberal women only. If your outside of their fense, they have no mercy. Same with blacks. If you're black and run with the Republican crowd, you're an uncle tom or worse.
Colin Powell is an 'uncle tom?'
.·*´¨)
.·`TCH
(..·*
010000110101001101101000011000010111001001110000010011110111001001000010011101010111001101110100
"When the debate is lost, slander becomes the tool of the loser." - Socrates
Vita contingit, Vive cum eo. (Life Happens, Live With it.)
"Life is not measured by the number of breaths we take, but by the moments that take our breath away." -- author unknown
"De omnibus dubitandum"