Level Extreme platform
Subscription
Corporate profile
Products & Services
Support
Legal
Français
Difficult for Palin
Message
From
05/09/2008 11:01:12
 
 
To
05/09/2008 09:00:06
General information
Forum:
Politics
Category:
News
Miscellaneous
Thread ID:
01343846
Message ID:
01345170
Views:
9
>>>>>>http://edition.cnn.com/2008/POLITICS/09/01/palin.daughter/index.html
>>>>>
>>>>>Her daughters pregnancy would not impact her job as a President if that came to be. And for sure she is not at fault for the daughter's pregnancy. Parents don't control their children as much as they wish they could.
>>>>>
>>>>>What I find of concern is her barbed little tongue, which she displayed in her speech. Perhaps McCain chose her to be his pit bull with lipstick so he didn't have to sully himself. That would be disappointing. I had hoped he would try to rally the US to address its present problems together, not bring four more years of Karl Rove type politics. The US cannot afford four more years of that.
>>>>
>>>>The news here reported that the speech was written before she was even picked as VP candidate. I have to say I don't like her and I find the whole barracuda thing nasty.
>>>
>>>You surpass yourself, really. So you mean that the speech with all personal-related episodes was written before she was even picked? Don't allow your emotions, dislike in this case, to get ahead of your mind. It would just make you looking sillier.
>>
>>They're probably getting it from here: http://www.time.com/time/politics/article/0,8599,1838808,00.html
>
>I already made this disclosure. Due to business-related constraints I cannot read links during business hours. Also, I am generally disinclined to read politically-related links (any bias) during any hours. In my opinion, every person is entitled and obliged to speak for her/himself (i.e. without links), and anyway, our days, every 3rd grader knows how to fish out every link to every point of view from the web. Please, do not consider anything I say here as related to your link. It is a general observation.

I understand. I didn't see your note about not being able to read the links - sorry about that. As far as the bias, well, this is Time magazine and honestly I have no idea what their bias is. In this particular story, it seems pretty neutral - just reporting what appear to be facts.
Previous
Next
Reply
Map
View

Click here to load this message in the networking platform