>If you look at the thread, you will see that my point in regard to fraud issue was exactly the opposite.
>In democracy every mainstream political force, and even most fringes, promise good times to everybody, or to majority at least, and when elected they are supposed to make good on some promises at least. This process may come in contradiction with 'common sense accounting', as Robert formulated it, and in many cases electionary process, which goes uninterrupted, takes preference. That's just the fact of real life, so I would not use the word 'fraud' to identify it.
Let's see if I understand. All politicians commit fraud, so let's better call it something else.
Difference in opinions hath cost many millions of lives: for instance, whether flesh be bread, or bread be flesh; whether whistling be a vice or a virtue; whether it be better to kiss a post, or throw it into the fire... (from Gulliver's Travels)
