Level Extreme platform
Subscription
Corporate profile
Products & Services
Support
Legal
Français
Rushmore fails on large tables
Message
General information
Forum:
Visual FoxPro
Category:
Databases,Tables, Views, Indexing and SQL syntax
Environment versions
Visual FoxPro:
VFP 9 SP2
OS:
Vista
Network:
Windows 2008 Server
Database:
MS SQL Server
Miscellaneous
Thread ID:
01346200
Message ID:
01346206
Views:
15
>Hi all,
>
>I have a problem whereby Rushmore seems to fail on a largeish table; 100k records 200 fields. Once the table goes beyond a certain size MIN(), MAX() and TOP 1 simple seem to stop being optimized properly even though SYS(3054) still indicates that it is being optimized.
>
>An example:
>* note Orders is 100k records and 200 fields wide
>* Indexed on OrdNo and LEFT(OrdNo,1)
>
>* This takes 50 seconds
>SELECT TOP 1 OrdNo FROM Orders WHERE OrdNo > cLastOrdNo ;
> AND Left(OrdNo,1) = cDept ORDER BY OrdNo
>
>* but seperate into a narrower table
>SELECT OrdNo FROM Orders INTO TABLE OrdersNoOnly
>INDEX ON OrdNo TAG OrdNo
>INDEX ON LEFT(OrdNo,1) TAG Dept
>
>* This takes 0.7 seconds although the table is still 100k records long
>SELECT TOP 1 OrdNo FROM OrdersNoOnly WHERE OrdNo > cLastOrdNo ;
> AND Left(OrdNo,1) = cDept ORDER BY OrdNo
>
>Has anyone ever encountered anything similar?

Hi,

In your example, table OrdersNoOnly is used exclusive, isn't it?
Also, what about file path? Are both tables located physically in the same directory?
Previous
Next
Reply
Map
View

Click here to load this message in the networking platform