>>>>>>>>Let's not change the subject. You started a thread with the apparent premise that any articles about Palin that do not put her in a flattering light are smears. I responded that I think the concerns about her use of state money for herself and her family are legitimate avenues of inquiry. I truly don't understand why you insist on viewing everything through the lens of Democrats or Republicans, or liberals and conservatives, as though we are two different species.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>Wow, where did you get that?
>>>>>>
>>>>>>Just from reading, ma'am.
>>>>>
>>>>>The article was written to capture the readers attention and suggests corruption where none existed. It was definite media slant. I'm surprised you didn't read that.
>>>>>
>>>>>Obama just experienced the same nonsense about his pig and lipstick comment. I'm sure you read that as media slant...
>>>>
>>>>I did, but it's going around. My hopes for a cleaner contest than usual have been exposed as a remnant of youthful hopefulness.
>>>>
>>>>I have not taken Palin's expenses as corruption, only abuse of taxpayer money. The taxpayers of Alaska should not have paid thousands of dollars to fly her 7 year old daughter to NYC. What I read is they stayed in a $700 per night room, also billed to the taxpayers. No, I don't think this should be dismissed as just partisan witch hunting.
>>>>
>>>>Let me be perfectly clear. I like Sarah Palin. I don't agree with any of her policy positions AFAIK but she seems like a nice lady. She has many good qualities. But I do not agree for a minute with the defensive posture that any questions about her are partisan mud slinging and nothing more. She accepted this opportunity and that is part of the deal. (Her family is not -- we agree on that). If McCain wins she will be in the #2 position, behind a man who is in his 70s and has cancer issues. Yes, questions should be asked. Damn right they should. And if any fair-minded journalist backs off because of political pressure, shame on them.
>>>
>>>You still miss the point. The point is not the investigation, but the presentation of the information from the investigation... It does appear from my standpoint that to you, a 'cleaner contest' only applies to how one candidate is treated...
>>
>>That sincerely is not true.
>>
>>My 5 minutes of fame ;-) are more than up -- catch you later.
>
>Ok, enjoy the rest of your day! :o) Catch you tomorrow...(maybe there will be a better conversation going on...)

Maybe so. (Just peeking).