>BTW, good point on the backward compatibility. I wouldn't count on WEXIST, WONTOP, etc to be around for ever < s >.

I wouldn't either, but I can't ever recall a command or function being removed. You're absolutely right, however. The objectifying (is this really a word :-)) of FoxPro has made them both obsolete, and of limited use. Much more powerful means exist to handle these situations.

And I wouldn't count on me for spelling either *g* (strickly??? Make that "strictly", jeez).

>>Personally, I think it's still around strickly for backward compatibility.