I agree. Funny though, Fox is one of the few that actually puts both sides on just about every discussion. I will agree they do more administration-friendly stories as news, but when they are attempting to discuss an issue, they just about always have someone representing both sides and the discussions are pretty good. I've seen a few good discussions on CNN that are done well with someone from both sides represented, but not like on Fox.



>It was quiet for a couple of days and as of this morning the "in the tank" media such as MSNBC are back on the warpath again with a wide-array of anti-Palin articles.
>
>I just don't think they give a rat's anymore. They know they're slanted, they know most everyone else is seeing it, so they're not going to hide it anymore. They see how successful Fox News is and they believe that Fox is biased so they are all hell bent to be the anti-Fox. Think so?
>
>>I think here the media is on very dangerous ground. I think that when you see them going through every single expense report that Governor Palin ever filed, if they don't do that for all four of the candidates, they're on very dangerous ground. I think the media so far has been the biggest loser in this race. And they continue to have growing credibility problems.
>>...
>>What happened here very clearly is that the controversy over Palin led to 37 million Americans tuning into a vice-presidential speech, something that is unprecedented, because they wanted to see for themselves. This is an election in which the voters are going to decide for themselves. The media has lost credibility with them.
>>
>>
>>http://www.cbsnews.com/stories/2008/09/11/politics/politicalplayers/main4442492.shtml