>>>>>I am sure they now feel very good about themselves and those who find their findings valuable will get a little frisson of righteousness as well.
>>>>
>>>>You're shooting the wrong messenger.
>>>
>>>Not shooting any messengers, just musing on soi disant judges of those with whom they do not share common interests, common goals or common responsibilities.
>>
>>In any legal system, I don't see how the judges and the accused share any interests, goals or responsibilities. On most of those, they are on opposite ends.
>
>This does not represent a legal system, it represents a self-appointed group who put on a show to validate "findings" which would better be described as ideological opinions. they are entitled to the opinions, just not the self-annointed righteousness. The people they are "indicting" are actual elected government officials with responsibilities only to the people who elected them. If you want to be legalistic, this kangaroo court has no "standing".

I also find it amusing that, of all the world, this would happen, and be publicized, in Japan. The country which has learned so much from the US... but is very sensitive to matters of war.