>>>>It is interesting that you find this particular part interesting.
>>>
>>>I know you think 911 was either the CIA or the Mossad or maybe never really happened but was just staged in Hollywood (like the moon landing) because it says so on somebody's blog and so it must be right but ...
>>
>>LOL C'mon Charles you can do better then that.
>>
>>yeah, I think the idea that they found the involvement of Al Queda based in Afghanistan as still up for debate rather showed where this bunch was coming from.
>>
>>Was it EVER on real debate ? (Especially between 9/11 and attacking Afganistan)
>
>Yes, you debated it years after 9 11 - saying you were not even convinced the Pentagon was attacked or that there wasn't some truth to Israel being behind the whole thing. I said at the time I thought that was nonsense and I see that at this point the folks who put together this tribunal are every bit as deluded.

Yes. I did say I newer managed see the plane on washington, I also said that I don't understand how 2 plains can knock down 3 buildings. I also made few joking posts reflecting on moon landing conspiracy theory.

What to tell ya; I can debate and question what ever I want.
But one thing is to be puzzled and question, and other thing is to positively believe.

Actually I would not mind having 9/11 discussion even today, but as last time when discussed, problem is that (obviosely/understandably) people get emotional over that, so perhaps public discussion is not really best thing to do with such sensitive subjects. This is when I abandoned discussion back then, and that is why I would not continue this
discussion today.

I overreacted to Tracy little bit over your previous message, but that was wrong because at the end of the day,
it was not my intelligence that you tried to insult but your own.