>FYI, I found a workaround, but I'm not exactly sure WHY it fixed the problem.
>
>After issuing the TableUpdate() command on the CA's cursor, I do a SEEK on the base table for the current primary key value. Once that seek is complete, the cursor keeps the changed value on the grid.
>
>In any case, a workaround is a workaround, no matter whether you understand it or not. Thanks for your help!
>
>Ben

Sounds like there is some buffering in place (record level) and there is implicit tablerevert or tableupdate going on behind the scenes. Can you look into this?