>>>Lack of prosecution doesn't prove anything, except that there was no prosecution. By that logic, robber barons weren't robbing, because they weren't imprisoned and their loot repossessed.
>>
>>Accessory to kidnapping and/or terrorist events that involve US citizens would bring down any US president.
>
>But he didn't help in getting them there, nor did he help any terrorist event. He only timed the release to suit his agenda. Not a major crime, just slime.

You mean conspiring with terrorists to have them keep US hostages longer than the terrorists intended is not a crime? Really?

Can't you do better than that? Usually you make better academic (if trivial and unsubstantiated) arguments to try to support whatever you are blaming the US government for.