>>Some will reflexively say this is just a partisan post. But I don't see how anyone can read this article with any degree of open mindedness and not be troubled about the prospect of this person becoming President of the U.S.
>>
>>http://www.nytimes.com/2008/09/14/us/politics/14palin.html?scp=13&sq=sarah%20palin&st=cse
>
>"pursued vendettas, fired officials who crossed her and blurred the line between government and personal grievance"
>
>Wow. That would be a first in American politics - especially in the office of the President or VP.
>
>Are you new here?

I was trying to figure out what was so unique about her in the article myself...

I LOVE this response to the article:

http://confederateyankee.mu.nu/archives/273413.php

After reading the NY Times rail against Sarah Palin's style of governance, making it very clear that they find it reprehensible when political appointees are replaced by incoming elected officials, I can only assume that they will protest loudly if the next President does not keep President Bush's appointees once he takes office.

It's good to know they support such a continuity in government, doesn't it?

this one was pretty good too:

http://hotair.com/archives/2008/09/14/the-management-style-of-palin-and-her-popularity/

This stuff is hilarious! I mean really!