>>>>Some will reflexively say this is just a partisan post. But I don't see how anyone can read this article with any degree of open mindedness and not be troubled about the prospect of this person becoming President of the U.S.
>>>>
>>>>http://www.nytimes.com/2008/09/14/us/politics/14palin.html?scp=13&sq=sarah%20palin&st=cse
>>>
>>>If only the media had done the job of vetting Bill Clinton back during his campaign....
>>
>>When you can't defend something, change the subject.
>
>I don't see how that is changing the subject. Vetting has not been done sufficiently for any of the candidates in recent elections... Isn't that your issue with Sara Palin?
>
>Also, why on earth would I need to support someone who belongs to a party I don't? Even if I belonged to her party I wouldn't be defending her. That's ludicrous...
>
>When did you get the impression (false one I may add) that I was a McCain/Palin supporter? Did I ever state that here?

When did I say you are a McCain/Palin supporter? I said you changed the subject, which you did.