>>>>Some will reflexively say this is just a partisan post. But I don't see how anyone can read this article with any degree of open mindedness and not be troubled about the prospect of this person becoming President of the U.S.
>>>>
>>>>http://www.nytimes.com/2008/09/14/us/politics/14palin.html?scp=13&sq=sarah%20palin&st=cse
>>>
>>>Read your post again Mike. It's like the women who says 'Some of you will just disregard my statements because I am a woman.' You already put the premise out there that anyone who would want to discuss it is either partisan or is not open minded. It's a typical democratic ploy and I'm dissappointed in you. You're starting to copy the pundits...
>>
>>One view on ellection campaign ;
>>http://english.aljazeera.net/news/americas/2008/09/200891312016615912.html
>
>I read that article earlier. The only part I disagree with is that the media attention surrounding the 'lipstick on a pig' came after the mcCain campaign response, which it did not. The media jumped first during the speech itself which the media were covering.

Establishing what came as to response to what durring dirty campaign is somewhat like deciding seniority between the chicken and the egg. Both Cicken and the egg in this case came from the same mother. Campaign. Which is a Pig!

( Burried in Lipstick... [vbg] )

Cheers :)