>>>>>Wasn't it Dubya who said a couple of years back, "You're either for us or against us."? Was he a democrat at that moment?
>>>>
>>>>At that particular moment when he first said "You either with us or against us." he was President of a country that had just suffered the first surprise attack on its mainland and he was framing US policy toward deciding who are friends were. He was making it clear that this was not a time for neutrality or equivocation.
>>>>
>>>>He certainly wasn't a big D Democrat. ( and did not consult Donna Brazil or focus groups before deciding who the bad guys were )
>>>
>>>I think you're mistaken. AFAIR he said this in about 2005 and it had more to do with Iraq than Afghanistan. If I'm wrong, my apologies, but I don't think I am.
>>
>>2001 in a joint news conference with French President Jacques Chirac:
>>
>>http://archives.cnn.com/2001/US/11/06/gen.attack.on.terror/
>
>It appears I was mistaken. My apologies to Charles, if he's reading this. If he isn't, then the heck with him anyway. ;)

it's an easy assumption to make because the media has been regurgitating it lately...