Hi,
Ignore the original post, the error is not in VFP but Java, we do a function call to a Java library and it has the problem.

Does Java run it's own clock, which is drifting?

>>Hi,
>>Is anyone having problems with the DATE() function returning dates in the future ?
>
>It is well known that all version of Fox, starting with FoxPlus in 1988 and on, have the Y10K bug - dbfs are incapable of storing dates beyond year 9999; datetimes could store that but VFP can't show those dates and reports them as blank:
>
>x=DATE(9999,12,31)
>?x
>x = x + 1
>?x
>but
>?x-34
>still returns a valid date, which means a variable can hold a date after 31-dec-9999 but it can't be displayed directly - you would have to roll your own.
>
>CREATE CURSOR uu (t t)
>x=DATEtime(9999,12,31, 23,22)
>INSERT INTO uu VALUES (x)
>INSERT INTO uu VALUES (x+2300)
>BROWSE
>go bott
>?t-33
>
>Last line displays a blank, which means VFP actually refuses to store such variables into datetime fields.
>
>That's a bug, and I don't expect it will be fixed, ever. If it does, it will be at the last minute, not our problem.