>>>>>IMHO, two totally different situations. In Obama's case, it's more an issue of taking a stance but doing the opposite. With Palin, it's typical political cleaning house and bringing those whom you trust into the fold.
>>>>>
>>>>>Neither are good (except that what Palin did is expected and standard practice but I don't see any corruption there or professing one thing and doing another), but this issue with taking a public stance on equal pay and rights for women but not practicing it concerns me more.
>>>>
>>>>You noted, of course, that the article doesn't mention whether those are all full-time staff or what their job titles and descriptions are, right? That article is insufficient to answer the question of whether he's giving equal pay for equal work.
>>>>
>>>>Tamar
>>>
>>>
>>>Of course position and responsibility is everything:
>>>
>>>http://www.scrippsnews.com/node/36234
>>
>>And then I read this in the Toronto Star, which I realise, for having written anything criticising McCain, is nothing but a left wing propaganda rag, but read it anyway.
>>
>>http://www.thestar.com/News/USElection/article/502839
>
>Interesting leadin to an article. I don't think I've ever premised an article with 'right wing proganda rag' or 'left wing propaganda rag' ...

I'm just heading off the expected major 'debating point' that others will use to attack the piece.