>>>>>IMHO, two totally different situations. In Obama's case, it's more an issue of taking a stance but doing the opposite. With Palin, it's typical political cleaning house and bringing those whom you trust into the fold.
>>>>>
>>>>>Neither are good (except that what Palin did is expected and standard practice but I don't see any corruption there or professing one thing and doing another), but this issue with taking a public stance on equal pay and rights for women but not practicing it concerns me more.
>>>>
>>>>You noted, of course, that the article doesn't mention whether those are all full-time staff or what their job titles and descriptions are, right? That article is insufficient to answer the question of whether he's giving equal pay for equal work.
>>>>
>>>>Tamar
>>>
>>>
>>>Of course position and responsibility is everything:
>>>
>>>http://www.scrippsnews.com/node/36234
>>
>>And then I read this in the Toronto Star, which I realise, for having written anything criticising McCain, is nothing but a left wing propaganda rag, but read it anyway.
>>
>>http://www.thestar.com/News/USElection/article/502839
>
>Interesting leadin to an article. I don't think I've ever premised an article with 'right wing proganda rag' or 'left wing propaganda rag' ...

I assume Alan was referring to all the hoo-ha here the other day labeling the NY Times a left wing rag for having the temerity to run a news story critical of Sarah Palin.