>>We are still pikers compared to the Chinese when it comes to human rights violations. But I agree with Walter's point that a few years ago it would have been difficult, if not impossible, for many to imagine the U.S. doing what we have at Abu Ghraib and Guantanamo Bay. Including many Americans. Yes, we have every reason to go after Al Qaeda hard, and up to a point we should. But we shouldn't sell our own souls in the process. We can't just chuck the Constitution out the window and still be the country we want to be.
>
>But if your goal was to get rid of those pesky constitutional restrains and finally take power for real, without being limited by the other two branches, who are either corrupt or activist anyway, wouldn't Al Qaeda be exactly what the doctor would order?
The problem with that scenario is that the power is short-lived. It would only last until the next election...
.·*´¨)
.·`TCH
(..·*
010000110101001101101000011000010111001001110000010011110111001001000010011101010111001101110100
"When the debate is lost, slander becomes the tool of the loser." - Socrates
Vita contingit, Vive cum eo. (Life Happens, Live With it.)
"Life is not measured by the number of breaths we take, but by the moments that take our breath away." -- author unknown
"De omnibus dubitandum"