Level Extreme platform
Subscription
Corporate profile
Products & Services
Support
Legal
Français
Obama pays women less than men
Message
From
21/09/2008 12:21:10
 
 
To
21/09/2008 00:36:17
General information
Forum:
Politics
Category:
Other
Miscellaneous
Thread ID:
01349111
Message ID:
01349312
Views:
21
>>>>IMHO, two totally different situations. In Obama's case, it's more an issue of taking a stance but doing the opposite. With Palin, it's typical political cleaning house and bringing those whom you trust into the fold.
>>>
>>>Bringing in those you trust and who are proven in government is one thing. Putting family members on salary is very different. If Obama were to become president and then bring in his family to salaried positions, I'm pretty sure it would suddenly not be so acceptable to the right. I absolutely agree that both things are wrong, but one should not be treated as acceptable while the other is denigrated.
>
>Absolutely. I would be like making one's brother Attorney General !

Concerning, but certainly not as concerning as hiring one of Fannie Mae's lobbyists for your campaign (as McCain did) or the former CEO's of Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac as your economic advisors (as Obama did)....
.·*´¨)
.·`TCH
(..·*

010000110101001101101000011000010111001001110000010011110111001001000010011101010111001101110100
"When the debate is lost, slander becomes the tool of the loser." - Socrates
Vita contingit, Vive cum eo. (Life Happens, Live With it.)
"Life is not measured by the number of breaths we take, but by the moments that take our breath away." -- author unknown
"De omnibus dubitandum"
Previous
Reply
Map
View

Click here to load this message in the networking platform