>>>>>Of course position and responsibility is everything:
>>>>>
>>>>>http://www.scrippsnews.com/node/36234
>>>>
>>>>Which seems to indicate that, at the time the numbers were reported, Obama's staff had more men in senior positions than women, which accounts for the disparity.
>>>
>>>And which is where there should be some parity, eh?
>>
>>Why?
>
>Because the lack thereof caused the imbalance.

If that's true, then the imbalance should not be an issue. I thought you were saying that equal numbers of men and women should be hired for each position level.