>>You seem to imply that America has to own her history but Turkey does not? I guess you don't own any of the history then?
>
>I think this is about "current republic" - since 1776 or since Ataturk. What was before those were different countries; the new ones came to be as a direct expression of disagreement (and disowning) on what the previous ones did.

You could know better that Turkey has never 'directly expressed disagreement' with Armenian massacres. By the way, we did not talk about responsibilities. It was just about personal opinions. May one still have an opinion about event happened in the country before current constitution was adopted? By the way, your idea that new constitution/regime means different country does not look too scientific.
Should I also understand that Serbia is brand new country existing since 1990 and never before?