We have had this discussion before. The entire newspaper industry is dying, and it doesn't have much to do with objectivity. It has a lot to do with a dumbed down populace which gets its information elsewhere or chooses to be uninformed.

Of course John is entitled to his opinion. I just don't want to talk politics with him any more. Well, at least not until after the election, when he will REALLY be whining, LOL.

>Mike, you're being thin-skinned. The NYT being pro-Obama to an extreme is not news to anyone. In fact, their loss of objectivity is probably why the subscriber numbers are plummetting as they are losing the trust factor.
>
>John is welcome to his opinion, isn't he? One thing for sure, Obama is the most unvetted, uninvestigated Presidential candidate in modern media history and that leaves a lot of doors open for interpretation.
>
>>>>http://www.cnn.com/2008/POLITICS/10/04/palin.obama/index.html
>>>>
>>>Who didn't expect the NYT to go on defense for their candidate. They are trying to create confusion as to whether or not Obama is untrustworthy. I already convinced, he can't be trusted with the garbage, much less our country.
>>
>>You already convinced? You were born convinced. Over and out with you on politics. We have had a meal together and I think you're a good guy but you and me and politics don't mix. Be well.