>All that said, I don't (yet) see a smoking gun, but I think Palin's involvement with this party is far more relevant and needs to be explored far more than Obama's incidental association with Ayers.
>
>Tamar
I agree that it may be an issue, we don't know yet. That is why I want all of Obama's questionable relationships with people like Jeremiah Wright, William Ayers, Rashid Kahlidi, Tony Rezko, and Odinga looked into more closely. The question is 'is it just association' or did either Palin or Obama agree with any of their (anti-american or pro-terrorism) views and support them in anyway? I think obama's associations are just as relevant if not more since his associates have actually taken action
against this government. I don't see why you don't see that. Also, I posted a link earlier which showed that Obama had much much more than just a passing association with Ayers. Did you miss it?
.·*´¨)
.·`TCH
(..·*
010000110101001101101000011000010111001001110000010011110111001001000010011101010111001101110100
"When the debate is lost, slander becomes the tool of the loser." - Socrates
Vita contingit, Vive cum eo. (Life Happens, Live With it.)
"Life is not measured by the number of breaths we take, but by the moments that take our breath away." -- author unknown
"De omnibus dubitandum"