>>>>>Guess which party is driving around picking up the mentally ill, homeless, felons? Yep, it's the same party that tends to also call upon the dead when it comes time to vote.
>>>>>
>>>>>http://www.nypost.com/seven/10062008/news/nationalnews/homeless_driven_to_vote_obama_132395.htm
>>>>
>>>>And your objection to homeless people voting is exactly what? Since when did losing your home mean you have to lose your vote?
>>>
>>>And you think that they will be given a fair assessment of both candidates? Oh, wait. I'm forgetting the hours I'm sure they spend each day reading and listening to the political opinions and discussions in order to make an informed decision...
>>
>>If an informed decision were a requirement for voting, half the population of both of our countries wouldn't be allowed in the door.
>
>The initial point was not about voting requirements. It was about which party used to look for 'second-rate' votes that could be mildly defined as bordering on legality.

I'd have thought it was pretty clear that I was responding tongue-in-cheek to the statement above - Oh, wait. I'm forgetting the hours I'm sure they spend each day reading and listening to the political opinions and discussions in order to make an informed decision....