>>>>>>>>>Hi Michel,
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>there is some non stringent result of the "View map of current thread" button.
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>I pressed it once:
>>>>>>>>> The Tree opens in the message area
>>>>>>>>>I click a single message of that tree
>>>>>>>>> The message is shown in message are
>>>>>>>>>I reclick the button
>>>>>>>>> Now the Tree is shown in the upper "Tree" area.
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>-Now the trees with the unseen messages since last login is gone
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>-Time Warp offers some times, but 12 hours is to short and one day is to much
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>I realy miss the "View all messages" button. As fine as UT is for following a running thread, to follow a older thread is a pain.
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>Agnes
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>Agnes,
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>I realy miss the "View all messages" button. As fine as UT is for following a running thread, to follow a older thread is a pain.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>+1
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>Maybe something like
>>>>>>>>- view first 15 messages
>>>>>>>>- view next 15 messages
>>>>>>>>- view previous 15 messages
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>That would be better than the 'old' way were there was a maximum of 50 messages
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>Sounds good. Number of messages by user Setting?
>>>>>>
>>>>>>Oh I'm happy with 10, 15 or 20 as long I as can see the next 10/15/20 or so
>>>>>>
>>>>>>Setting the checkbox of the first 15 - view - uncheck 15 - check next 15 - view ..... is a pain
>>>>>>[ pain also: check all - view - sorry, max 15 my friend ]
>>>>>>
>>>>>>As to the number of message linked to a user setting - I'm afraid Michel won't buy that
>>>>>
>>>>>Are we refering to the same?
>>>>>
>>>>>I think "view messages" to show n messages at a time with some navigation to next / previous n messages
>>>>>
>>>>>Adjust n on user level is surplus.
>>>>>
>>>>>Agnes
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>Oh yes - we are talking about the same
>>>>
>>>>It's just that I read in thread somewhere that Michel is not in favour of big requests hitting the server
>>>>So if someone would be able to set n = 50 or more - he wouldn't be happy
>>
>>??
>
>I've touched the wrong button. Read my prev message again.

Done and agree