Plateforme Level Extreme
Abonnement
Profil corporatif
Produits & Services
Support
Légal
English
Dems, the party of illegal voter registrations
Message
De
09/10/2008 17:03:54
Jay Johengen
Altamahaw-Ossipee, Caroline du Nord, États-Unis
 
 
À
09/10/2008 16:56:26
Walter Meester
HoogkarspelPays-Bas
Information générale
Forum:
Politics
Catégorie:
Autre
Divers
Thread ID:
01353735
Message ID:
01353941
Vues:
24
Who is Stacy?

>>SNIP
>>>Now the R's are way behind in the polls, they revert to the old tacticts that gave them victory a couple of times: Throwing mud.
>>
>>Please support that statement with facts and evidence that those tactics actually gave the Rs victory.
>
>RATS
>
>Of course this is only one example and how on earth could you measure what effect this had on the election.
>
>Second is that the R's have succeeded to degenerate the word 'liberal' totally out of context. Over time its meaning has changed totally of it original. This explains why the liberals in europe are the right wing and considered left in the US.
>
>I remember mud throwing towards clinton and kerry on their standpoint in the vietnam war. The R's really have a reputation on playing on the person rather than talking about really important issues. If you think I'm wrong, can you explain me why you got stuck with Bush for 8 years?
>
>As some will acuse the D's for lying, Remember "Read my lips, no more taxes". Now, isn't this stealing the election? This is far worse than clintons sexual hobbies and lying about it !!
>
>>Reading your message it appears that you only want to discuss something if it supports your view. Anything that doesn't is just dismissed. It is a FACT that some folks are deploying illegal voter fraud. They tried it on my daughter - I posted that here and I reported it. I never claimed it was only the Dems, others did. In fact, I posted the name of a group supported by the Rs who were accused in the past of voter fraud. Open your eyes Walter. You just threw mud yourself and it's a low blow used when there isn't a good argument to support your position.
>
>Stacy, I don't think you did read what my position is in this matter. I never said that it does or does not happen. I'm very neutral on that one (see my message to John). I have no opinion on that one, as I'm aware that you hardly can hold either the D's or R's responsible for these incidents.
>
>OTOH, using these kind of silly arguments as ammonition to support your favourate party is wat I said, Throwing mud with the intention to damage the other side. Hence my reply to johns post.
Précédent
Suivant
Répondre
Fil
Voir

Click here to load this message in the networking platform