I have spoken at several code camps and have never seen Microsoft ask for any evals of speakers. In fact, that would somewhat go against the CodeCamp idea where it is run for and by the community and is technology/language agnostic.


>In 2008 the suggestion is that focus is shifting more towards contributions at Code Camps. If this is the case then the benefit of showing competence in front of potential customers/employers/colleagues is a great opportunity by itself. Extra reward may even turn into an own goal as financial types continue to assume more and more traditionally technical roles. MS can head that off to an extent by asking attendees at Code Camps to rate presentations and including that in their deliberations, which I presume they do now.