Hi Sergio, yes I had some good suggestions from Dorin with the first release of PDFx.

Also about VFPx, I haven't had the time to send the document, and to be honest I'm not sure if I want to, I don't like the fact of some of them protecting some existing commercial applications and some not, I think that kind of behavior scares and disappoint a lot of VFP Developers to participate. I know anyone can start their own project in Codeplex, but for example if ActiveVFP were accepted in VFPX I'm sure will have much more attention from VFP developers around the world. Also, after reading Doug reply on my message I'm not sure, PDFx will compete with XFRX, FRX2ANY, and all the others. But you never know what future will bring.

By the way, thanks for your work on ReportSculptor I have not try it yet in a real deep way, I hope to do it soon and if I have suggestions let you know.

Luis

>Hi Luis
>
>I believe Doug clarified by the end of that thread that RS could potentially go to VFPx.
>Truth being told, I am not ready for that myself at this point in time.
>
>BTW I saw your PDFx project which quiet a bit reminded me of simillar project done by Dorin Vasilescu.
>It would be nice if two of you guys would somehow join forces and try to bake one good PDF library.
>That would imo made it an excellent VFPx project :)
>
>
>
>\>Take a look at message id 1325325
>>
>>>It was my impression that ReportSculptor does not compete with any commercial products, does it?
>>>
>>>>Lets just hope they will accept it, and don't try to protect commercial products as usual :)
>>>>
>>>>>Why don't you move it to VFPx?