>>I've heard the odd complaint about degradation of service but not encountered much (except my recent comment of tags). HOWEVER, I went to do a member search, which, I think, used to include forename, surname, and/or member ID boxes, et al.
>>
>>Now there are only GP or Member ID (If you know the member ID why need to search, FGS?)
>>
>>and the message is:
>>
>>You may enter a search value to be searched [sic] in the last name, city, company or email field.
>>Or, you may enter the member ID in the ID field if you know it.
>>
>>I wanted to search on forename.
>>
>>The old adage "If it ain't broke don't fix it" rings so true at the moment. What's going on with all these unnecessary and counter-productive changes?
>
>I guess one search box (universal) was easier to implement going forward than custom form. BTW, I also used this search a minute ago. I typed "Kelly" in the search box and it brought me lots of Kelly in the first name, though it was not supposed to, I think.

Well I was looking for Cristoff, as I saw him in an old FP Advisor (2000), as Lange, and thought "I'm sure that's not his name", searched for him and no hit. I seem to recall he got married a few years ago and changed his name to his wife's. Anyhow, I (thought I) couldn't search on the forename tio check his current surname.

Also, have you noticed that when composing a message, sometimes the bottom button panel of the message gets screwed up and untidy, over 2 lines?